Research Offer

Hello,

I’ve been correctly calling individual stock moves for the last 5 years. I’d like to offer my research to you.

My stock picks have outperformed the market handily. The nice part: You can verify my claim – I blog at SeekingAlpha.com. You can read my articles and note some very timely calls.

For instance, I have been long Apple since 2007 and short Nokia, RIM, and Hewlett-Packard. During a 5-year period, I published over 50 articles explaining why Apple should be bought and its competitors sold. Following my advice would have a portfolio manager’s career as Apple soared and Nokia, RIM, H-P crashed.

I correctly predicted Pilgrim’s Pride’s bankruptcy. Making a bet against that company would have made the portfolio boatloads of cash.

I suggested dumping Bank of America and, instead, buying a small regional bank. Bank of America cratered; the regional soared.

I suggested buying a basket of SaaS stocks in 2011 – all either doubled or were taken out a year later.

More recently, in January, I predicted 7 stocks – Limited Brands, Wynn Resorts, The Buckle, Werner Enterprises, Stamps.com, Armstrong Worldwide, and MTOX Scientific – would announce large special dividends before year’s end. To date, Limited, Wynn, The Buckle, Werner, and Armstrong have all declared special dividends. MTOX didn’t get a chance – it got acquired, giving shareholders a 94% YTD return.

I’d like to offer you or your firm research to help you pick next year’s winners.

I am a retired physician who has been analyzing stocks for 15 years. I publish my market research on SeekingAlpha.com, where I am followed by a number of money managers and analysts. I use a combination of technical and fundamental analysis as well as proprietary metrics. My picks – both long and short – have been very successful. I’d be glad to give you the links to my articles so you can substantiate my claims.

I am eager to share my advice and research on an exclusive basis.

If you’re interested, you can reach me at stephenjrosenman@gmail.com.

Best,

Stephen J. Rosenman

seekingalpha.com/author/stephen-rosenman

Friday, February 1, 2013

Why Apple's Profits Are At Risk



Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More...)
Nobody likes to work harder for the same money. It's absolutely frustrating.
Apple (AAPL) is finding itself in that very position. Apple's earnings were flat last quarter despite selling more iProducts than the year before. In a nut shell, as Apple churns out more iProduct, it makes less money per item.
Adding up the quarter's iPhones, iPads, iPods and computers, Apple soldan aggregate 87.5 million iProducts. During the year-ago quarter, Apple moved 73 million. Yet, in both quarters, Apple earned $13 billion. (If you want to get even more bummed out, operating income actually droppedby $100 million this quarter.)
Why is this happening? Average unit profits at Apple are decreasing. Apple earns less from every unit sold than it did a year ago. The company made $197 before taxes on each unit sold in the quarter just reported; last year, it earned $241 a unit. This 22% unit profit decline is difficult to make that up on volume.
That's Business 101: Unit profit X Units = Profits. If unit profits decline, you'll need to sell more just to keep up.
Take a look at Apple's unit profits by quarter over the last 7 year. They are starting to drop. That hasn't happened for 8 years.
(Unit profits calculated as operating income per unit. My data, sourced from 10Qs)
You might blame decreased unit profits on product mix: Fewer high margin iPhone 5s and more lower margin iPads were purchased this quarter. Perhaps Apple launched too many new products at once and is experiencing greater initial costs, problems that will go away. Maybe next quarter, Apple will reverse the trend. Perhaps.
I'm skeptical. This isn't the first time Apple's unit profit declined. In the July quarter, unit profits dropped as well. In the October quarter, unit profits were flat. This is a pattern that's getting entrenched.
It all comes down to this - Apple's products have sold at humongous premiums, far exceeding any competing company. That marketplace largesse never lasts, something Apple longs are finding out the hard way. Amazon gets criticized for its nosebleed valuation. Well, Apple has been getting nosebleed pricing. It has been able to extract wads of cash from its customers and carriers. On average, Apple makes an incredible $197 on each item it sells (and that includes all the shuffles and nanos as well as the iPhones and iPads.)
That's miles above the competition. Amazon (AMZNis willing to take azero unit profit to move its tablets. A similar strategy for an Amazon smartphone could be a game changer. Samsung (SSNLF.PK) taking market share in the global market by selling excellent smartphones and tablets at a lower unit profit. Using IDC smartphone estimates and Samsung's mobile operating income, Samsung earns approximately $92 dollars a unit, less half Apple's $197. Chinese manufacturers as Huaweiand ZTE are content with tiny profit margins to move their goods. Apple has credible competition willing to take zero to half its unit profits. As a result, Apple's high margins will come under pressure.
Apple's unit profits are unsustainable at their current level and have already fallen by 22%. Even at a diminished $197, they can still fall a lot further. You can only make up so much on volume. Apple's future earnings are vulnerable to sinking unit profits.
Additional disclosure: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

The Apple Blow Up



Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More...)
Apple (AAPL) investors were hoping for a blow-out quarter. Instead, they got a "blow up" as Apple missed on revenue and reported declining gross margins.
The result was brutal as Apple sank more than 10% in after hours dropping through my $480 price target. I got a lot of grief from readers when I went negative on Apple. My bearish forecast was spot-on.
Unfortunately, Apple is not done going lower. I've outlined before why Apple is a must-not own stock. You can see my reasons here and here. To review, Apple's profit margins are unsustainable. Last April, Apple reported a humongous 39% operating margin - crazy-high for a hardware company. That translated into Apple making an astronomical $263 on each sale before taxes. No computer or handset company makes anywhere close to $263 on each sale. Not even close. To put it in perspective, in its heyday, RIM (RIMM) made $126 from each unit sold. Apple had only one way to go as far as unit profits - down. This quarter, cost-conscious customers opted for the less expensive iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S rather than the higher margin iPhone 5. Operating margins tumbled to 31.6% from 37.4% year-ago quarter.
Moreover, Apple doesn't control any of its manufacturing or supply chain. That wreaked havoc this quarter. Apple found itself without enough product to sell because of supply constraints for the iPhone 5, iPad Mini, and iMac. When I predicted this a few months ago, readers went bonkers. Turns out Apple didn't have the goods. My concern was correct. It doesn't matter how much demand there is for your product - if you don't have the product to sell, you aren't going to get your sales. Apple recognizes the dilemma and is trying to get more control of production. Per CFO Peter Oppenheimer:
We are buying equipment that we will own that we will put in partners' facilities. Our primary motivation there is for supply, but we get other benefits as well.
Without more direct control, Apple's a sitting duck.
There are two key numbers in the myriad of earnings data to focus on:
1. Gross margins fell 610 basis points year over year to 38.6% as Apple met higher manufacturing costs. The drop in gross margin is probably not done. Apple expects margins to decline to 37.5% to 38.5%.
2. As mentioned, Apple isn't making as much money on each sale. Apple earned $196 before taxes on each unit sold, a $44 drop from the year-ago quarter. The declining unit profitability is the most worrisome stat out there. Apple has been able to boost its unit profits for 6 years. The consumer has been handing Apple higher premiums year after year. That trend started to break down in the July quarter. It's now shattered.
I wanted to make a special note: This time a number of analysts got it right. Tavis McCourt of Raymond James hit it out of the park with a perfect $13.81 EPS estimate and pretty darned close 48 million iPhone sales. Remarkable job. Sometimes we dump all over the analysts. This quarter, they did a great job forecasting. In fact, the pros' consensus of $13.45 was far better than that of the independent analysts' $15.11 with once-wunderkind Andy Zaky stuck out in left field at $16.85. The analyst community has been getting a better read on Apple and, going forward, investors would be wise to pay close attention to McCourt and Avi Silver of CLSA (EPS $13.85 on $54.8 billion revenue). They are the hot hands right now.
Additional disclosure: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

PetSmart Due For A Correction



Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More...)
After doubling in two years, PetSmart (PETM) has been range bound between $64-$72. This pet specialty retailer looks ready to roll over and play dead.
The company is trading at valuations that are greater than its 5-year historical PE, P/B, P/S, and P/CF averages. At a pricey 21 P/E, it's poised for a correction.
PetSmart's high-growth days are behind it. The company is no longer putting up lots of new stores as its market is becoming saturated. Last year, PetSmart added 46 stores to a 1232 base, a 3.7% increase. Gone are the heady days when the company grew its store count by 14% (2005).
(Sourced from 10ks)
Instead, PetSmart is relying on boosting its margins to deliver earnings growth. That's been successful so far. However, it's hard to improve on a 9.2% operating margin. Very few brick-and-mortar retailers top that.
 Chart
PetSmart's margins are unlikely to keep climbing. In fact, they might start to decline for the following reasons.
  1. The payroll tax has reverted back to 6.2% leaving less money in the pocket. That should help drive more customers back to the less expensive grocery store, Wal-Mart (WMT), Target (TGT), feed stores, Sam's and Costco (COST), and on-line shopping.
  2. There's nothing unique about PetSmart. Walk into any Petco, a private chain selling pet products. Petco looks identical to PetSmart - same merchandise, dog grooming and training. Petco has a similar store count and its stores are in the same zip codes as PetSmart.
  3. PetSmart's higher margin service business doesn't have as much room to run. The chart below shows the gradual deceleration in service growth. Services as a share of revenue have topped out.
(Sourced from 10Ks)
4. PetSmart is over-staffed. PetSmart has over 23,000 full-time and 27,000 part-time employees. The company has 1278 stores. That's an average of 18 full-time employees supporting an average store. In contrast, Tractor Supply (TSCO) is similarly sized with 1151 stores but has a far fewer 8700 employees for a much lower eight workers per store count.
While pet owners love their pets, there are other options. I'm reminded of another retailer, Toys "R" Us (TOYS). Investors believed that customers would never abandon the toy retailer. Eventually, that's what shoppers did, spending their money at Wal-Mart and Target instead, and cratering Toys "R" Us.
PetSmart may be the next Toys "R" Us. I would look to a significant pull back in PetSmart.
Disclaimer: The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.
Comments
Track new comments on this article
All (10)Author's Picks (2)
  • "While pet owners love their pets, there are other options."

    Weren't those options around in 2010 when the margins increased as well? It's not as though Petco, Walmart and Target opened up this year or even last year. Petsmart has PetsHotels - I don't think Petco has similar? WMT? TGT?

    What customer does PETM target? The higher-end or the lower-end? The economy has been slow for a while now, yet PETM continues to do well? If the economy picks up, won't that help PETM? Sure, payroll tax is up, but I think employment picking up will do more to offset that if it happens.

    If this is true, I think it would take more than the payroll tax going back up to put a dent.

    "The American Pet Products Association, or “APPA,” estimated that the market for pet products rose nearly 200% from 1994 to 2011, and will reach $53 billion in 2012, reflecting 5.3% growth year over year. It attributes part of the increase to baby boomers with empty nest syndrome (loneliness caused by offspring leaving home), as well as young professionals putting off having children in favor of focusing on their careers."

    Not saying PETM can't/won't go through a correction - that's possible in any stock, but I don't think it necessarily means that the company is about to collapse like Toys 'R Us did.
    23 Jan, 05:25 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike1
  • While I like Seeking Alpha to get some fresh ideas and different perspectives, reading an article like this one makes me realize you really have to take what people write with a grain of salt. I doubt the author has ever listened to a conference call or an investor presentation. He tries to compare staffing at Tractor Supply to a pet store??? He doesn't even mention stock buybacks and doesn't seem to understand industry growth. Forgets to mention the Petsmart has vet offices in their Petsmarts, runs Pet Hotels, has been growing their proprietary brands and consumers are shifting towards premiums pet foods. I could go on, but it's really not worth it. Nor am I saying Petsmart is a screaming buy. I just don't understand why anyone would pay any attention to this article.

    BTW - Maybe you aren't aware, but most stocks are trading above their 5 year multiples. That's what happens to a stock market when a country climbs out of a deep recession.
    23 Jan, 08:24 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike1
  • Nice article. At least one analyst at Nomura agrees with the author.
    28 Jan, 12:12 PMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike0
  • TOTALLY AGREE...Flag was first; floor layout-product line comparison PETCO-PETSMART, second and clincher was TSC farm supply and Petsmart pet supply comparison- totally an error.
    31 Jan, 03:16 PMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike0
  • Mr.Rosenman may have a good statistical approach but does not understand the PetSmart Culture. Spend some time visiting the other retailers mentioned in the article and then visit your local PetSmart. Arm yourself with questions to pose to the sales associates about their products, services, etc and you will soon see the difference. PetSmart customers are a very loyal group. The number of associates may make a good statistic; but, store to store it runs rather lean. PetSmart associates are very well treated and turnover is minimal compared to the general retail industry.
    23 Jan, 02:51 PMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike0
  • I agree with the comment above (DMS123) and when it comes to shorting in my opinion there are many other better plays than Petsmart. Generally the demographics that go to Petsmart are families with children and people who are passionate about their pets. Now this doesn't mean if you go to Wal-mart and buy dog food that your not passionate about your pets, but when it comes to the customer experience you get at PetSmart, you are most likely to come back.

    I think the mentioning that "PetSmart is over-staffed. PetSmart has over 23,000 full-time and 27,000 part-time employees. The company has 1278 stores. That's an average of 18 full-time employees" I believe this to be a tad-bit over generalized. From a consumer point-of-view I have never seen 18 employees in a PetSmart and one has to remember a lot of PetSmarts have a veterinarian on site/ possibly a vets assistant/ sales staff that is more knowledgeable that a Wal-mart pet section employee/etc etc.

    I would only be concerned about PetSmarts competition if they decided to expand there Pet sections to include more services and offerings as PetSmart is doing. Right now, I don't see that happening as PetSmart still has a strong hold on the Pet market. However, On the flip side you are correct about the trading range/fundamentals, which it has been suck in for a while; I just don't think this is a great short sale candidate
    25 Jan, 11:27 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike0
  • Down nearly 7% today on a downgrade from Nomura. Sounds like the author has been proven right IMO.

    PETM seemed bubbly in valuation and this is just proving it
    28 Jan, 10:32 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Author's Pick (undo)Like0
  • You can't be proven right by an analyst downgrade since they are just speculating. You need to wait to see what earnings actually are. I wish I could read the whole analysis, but I did read they are concerned about Amazon eating away at Petsmart online. Considering how small Petsmart's online sales are compared to their stores it doesn't seem to be much of a concern to me. I felt PETM was reasonably valued in the high 60's. Their 55 target seems ridiculously low to me.
    28 Jan, 11:18 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike1
  •  Thanks. Nomura echoed my thoughts on the vibrant competition Petsmart is facing as well as margin risk.
    28 Jan, 11:24 AMReplyReport Abuse  |  Make Author's PickLike1
  • Good call. Stock was over valued. Question is whether pet owners have found a more satisfying store to shop at. Personally petsmart reminds me of a dollar store. Have lots of issues with animals they sell. Use contract vets to hide the problems